The whole ‘reducing CO2’ climate change argument will destroy life on our planet. At what point did we forget elementary school science when we learned that plants use CO2 and turn it into oxygen? Humans need it too. Simple concept. We need more trees and more farms, not less.
What we, the people, really need to do is insist that all of these egotistical, self important globalist types STOP flying around in their private jets. Until they do, people like Bill Gates, should STFU about “climate change” because that alone makes it obvious that it’s not about the planet or people, but CONTROL of us.
I am not giving up my car, living in a "15-minute city", accepting a "carbon budget", or eating bugs. But cleaning up rivers and protecting wildlife? Count me in!
When did these politicians lose their ever loving minds? RFK comes at problems with common sense and real solutions that we can all come together around.
I appreciate that there is one candidate that is talking about regenerative farming and the disgusting mining practices that have been accelerated for the ‘green’ agenda.
There are so many problems and I don’t expect to agree 100% with any candidate.
I like RFK. I actually discuss him (and a DeSantis in a previous article), but more and more I analyze the election process, I just don’t think the current process will yield any substantial change.
I think it’s best we direct our energies at our local governments -- the ones that we can go right up too if they don’t comply with our votes vs presidential governments that are too big to be held accountable
Changing the corporate capture of our agencies will be a titanic shift in the business as usual model. Doing the proper studies to find out what is causing the explosion in chronic disease and obesity in our children is an imperative. Many important changes can and must happen at the top, which RFK can easily accomplish by executive order. But, of course all politics is local too.
Mr Kennedy I am a long time independent conservative thinker and voter. I find you to be so much more appealing than the current president and the former President now running for the office again. I however find your views on climate change discouraging. As you say the EPA and USDA appear to be captured like the CDC and FDA are. I think you need to look into the capture of the EPA and the climate change industry. Just as big pharmaceutical Companies rig their trials to achieve the pre determine outcome the same thing is occurring in climate science. The only studies funded are those that fit the pre approved narrative. Therefore the statement that the science is settled is a lie just as is the statement that the MRNA shots were safe and effective.
To earn my vote for President you will need to clarify that your not opposed to the continue use of fossil fuels and will oppose any bans on the use of the internal combustion engine. That fossil fuels have propelled billions out of poverty and early deaths and that they will continue to be vital to our economic success. That you will never impose a massive cost on the American people by banning cheap and plentiful fossil fuels that the only way to help raise people out of poverty will be fossil fuels and the economic growth that comes from their use. That you will dismantle the same agencies that continue to fund only research that supports a narrative which is anti-scientific.
I'll second that call for more clarity on his stance on combustible fuels (oil, gas and coal). I saw the para about eliminating subsidies on oil and coal. That's fine. How about curtailing those subsidies (and agency/corporate capture) carved out for the so-called 'green' energy sources and products?
Each electric car reportedly gets about $50,000 in subsidies. The lifetime environmental costs per vehicle end up being MORE than a Toyota Corolla or Matrix.
Gee, let me guess whose funding those subsidies...me and thee! Not to mention the overall environmental factor. I'm all for exploring and implementing new technologies that MAY bring a net environmental benefit when matured.
Do you know what the overall subsidies are and have been for big oil? The military industrial complex is built on the oil capture model. These policies, that serve the top, have curtailed progress in alternatives greatly. If we had an equal playing field, green would win hands down. We currently do not have the grid needed to transport alternative energy, which RFK wants to invest in. The way electric costs have risen, we should all be in favor of cheaper options,
Agreed. It’s not enough to change around the leadership in these agencies. They need to be dismantled and their responsibilities removed from the fed and returned to the states.
No Donald failed his exam during COVID-19. He had his shot and he blew it. Yes the deep state lied to him. But it was in the end his call on the lockdowns and warp speed and both were failures. Donnie tried to bullshit his way out of Covid because that is what he does. Something’s like COVID-19 needed true wisdom which Donnie doesn’t have. Don’t shot the messenger I vote for him twice only because Hilary is the evil and vile person on this earth and FJB is all you need to know.
To earn my vote for President you will need to clarify that your not opposed to the continue use of fossil fuels and will oppose any bans on the use of the internal combustion engine. That fossil fuels have propelled billions out of poverty and early deaths and that they will continue to be vital to our economic success. That you will never impose a massive cost on the American people by banning cheap and plentiful fossil fuels that the only way to help raise people out of poverty will be fossil fuels and the economic growth that comes from their use.
I’d like to know his opinion on GeoEngineering… which is the REAL threat to our climate and humanity. TPTB want to tap into a new trillion dollar industry of controlling the weather- as if they were God. That’s the real threat to humanity, in my opinion. NO MORE seeding of the clouds… which is changing weather patterns dramatically! And no more weather experimentation on the globe.
Agree on agencies and regenerative practices. Disagree on CO2/("carbon" as the brainwashed say) has anything to do with climate change and in fact is of major importance to the health of our planet. Dont try to reduce CO2. Dont believe the corporate science or media. Listen to all the Noble Lauriate scientists who have been censored.
CARBON DIOXIDE GOES IN THE PLANTS, AND THEN OXYGEN IS RELEASED FROM THE PLANTS. WITHOUT CARBON DIOXIDE, THEY CANNOT EXIST AND WE CANNOT EXIST BECAUSE WE NEED THE OXYGEN THEY RELEASE = PHOTOSYNTHESIS ...
Sadly, what some Americans want is a PERFECT candidate. We'll never have that. Mr Kennedy, however, is very close, esp with this, his environmental agenda. He is spot on about regenerative farming, healing soils and ecosystems damaged by industrial agriculture, and localizing solutions. Whether liberal or conservative, we can all participate, esp at the local level by livingwelllocally.substack.com
"May the road rise up to meet us all" when we work together to heal people, places, and planet.
To all interested in some alternative views on climate; I'm a Belgian subscriber.
RFK calls climate change a serious problem. I wonder why? His background and understanding of Globalist lies would give me another impression.
Therefore I invite everyone to please, please carefully read the Clintel.org peer-review of the IPCC AR6 report, "the fozen views of the IPCC". Next fact-check it or have it done, even more truly and carefully than you read it, and you probably will never believe the IPCC, UN, and many others ever again.
Clintel peer review of the IPCC AR6 is subscribed and endorsed by a group of well over 1650 impartial scientists, amongst 2 true Nobel prize winners. One of them is the 2022 Nobel prize winner for phisics John Clauser, subscribing and endorsing Clintel's work. The 1650 are all graduates, Phd's, professors, or otherwise honoured and celebrated, unlike the IPCC pseudo-"top-scientists" that count some 400 lead-autors and 800 non graduates, even a more than fair portion of 1st year uniev students.
J.Clauser supports Clintel's "there is no climate urgency" after studying their IPCC AR6 critical review report. John Clauser now is deplatformed, defamed, de-everythinged, .... same as JFK jr and Clintel themselves ofcourse. They also are not welcome anymore in the same places.
The document from Clintel.org: "the fozen views of the IPCC".
I whish you all, all the love and wisedom in the world.
I look forward to you banning Fluoridation in USA and all of its occupied territories, including the military bases and assets. The FAN legal case against EPA was started in 2016 and still going!
I’ve not heard him talk about this issue, but he should look into this in his mission of understanding the causes of chronic disease. It’s rather bizarre that we ingest an industrial waste for whiter, stronger teeth;))
Thank you ,we need you .The horrible changing of our atmosphere through government manipulation with nanoparticulants and toxic metals. This is changing humans and animals blood, from breathing this stuff in and eating the foods ,drinking the water.We need the spraying if toxic chemicals to stop. I believe if you use this as your cause , you could very well win.
The "left" has been fear mongering about the environment for 50+ years...New York was going to be flooded by the year 2000...lying for so long about so many things. Using flawed environmental models, ignoring any and all evidence that contradicted or threatened to expose their lies.
Sorry Mr. Kennedy...while you may be running as an "Independent" you really are just another liberal democrat. I'm done.
RFK,Jr, thank you for your panel of farmers, agriculturists, and other professionals (I think about 15 or more), presented this spring. It demonstrates your incredible ability to find people with the know how that includes cleaning our soil, water and air; producing healthy food (nature's medicine); and creating more profit for farmers and their staff. That we can provide Mexico with non-gmo seed, make millions for our farmers and yet our government won't allow it, crazy! God bless!
Excellent essay! It's tough trying to "thread the needle" on the topic, especially on climate change (hopefully he'll do the same with Gaza?). Way back in 1988, before it got political, I studied the subject in an U of M biology class. Then, and now, I believe the evidence supports it being a serious problem. I've lived in Michigan for almost 60 years, it's clear that the climate has started going off the rails (crazy hot summers, winters whipsawing between warm and cold). Unfortunately, many in the health freedom movement who were right on Covid, have failed to apply the same skepticism toward those downplaying the issue. Just like Big Pharma pushed bad "science" for profit, Big Oil has done the same with climate change propaganda to protect their profits. Everyone needs to do their own research and explore both sides of the issue.
Agreed folks should do their own research. Would also argue that the 'green' industry, along with all their backers from - WHO, WEF, Gates etc, have also bought and disseminated substantial amounts of biased propaganda in favor of their so called green 'solutions'.
I'm not a fan of top-down WEF/WHO "solutions" to climate change. I would prefer the CCL"s (Citizens's Climate Lobby) proposal for putting a price on carbon pollution and returning the proceeds directly to the citizens.
I can’t deny my lying eyes. I live on the coast not far from Cape Cod, where RFK grew up, The flooding events are now routine. Our beaches are gone at high tide. Something has happened. My instincts tell me that most of this is coming from natural cycles, although excessive carbon can cause warming. So do acidic oceans and decimating forests. I think he wants to focus most on clean up and regeneration, which is good all the way around. He also wants to build the grid to transport new energy technologies, which is also only good. From my cursory study on this issue, we should be seriously looking at the incoming ice age and start preparing for life and food production indoors. It may be a long time from now, or it may come rapidly, but come it will, according to many scientists.
The whole ‘reducing CO2’ climate change argument will destroy life on our planet. At what point did we forget elementary school science when we learned that plants use CO2 and turn it into oxygen? Humans need it too. Simple concept. We need more trees and more farms, not less.
What we, the people, really need to do is insist that all of these egotistical, self important globalist types STOP flying around in their private jets. Until they do, people like Bill Gates, should STFU about “climate change” because that alone makes it obvious that it’s not about the planet or people, but CONTROL of us.
You’re 100% correct. You may like my article about the truth of climate change:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-climate-change-is-wrong-dangerous
This is precisely what RFK is trying to stop, the divide, the anger and the paralysis that just keeps the rich getting richer.
Is RFK jr a proponent of eugenics?
I am not giving up my car, living in a "15-minute city", accepting a "carbon budget", or eating bugs. But cleaning up rivers and protecting wildlife? Count me in!
When did these politicians lose their ever loving minds? RFK comes at problems with common sense and real solutions that we can all come together around.
I appreciate that there is one candidate that is talking about regenerative farming and the disgusting mining practices that have been accelerated for the ‘green’ agenda.
There are so many problems and I don’t expect to agree 100% with any candidate.
I like RFK. I actually discuss him (and a DeSantis in a previous article), but more and more I analyze the election process, I just don’t think the current process will yield any substantial change.
I think it’s best we direct our energies at our local governments -- the ones that we can go right up too if they don’t comply with our votes vs presidential governments that are too big to be held accountable
Here are my articles if interested:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-we-should-appreciate-desantis
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-we-need-to-stop-voting-in-presidential
Changing the corporate capture of our agencies will be a titanic shift in the business as usual model. Doing the proper studies to find out what is causing the explosion in chronic disease and obesity in our children is an imperative. Many important changes can and must happen at the top, which RFK can easily accomplish by executive order. But, of course all politics is local too.
Mr Kennedy I am a long time independent conservative thinker and voter. I find you to be so much more appealing than the current president and the former President now running for the office again. I however find your views on climate change discouraging. As you say the EPA and USDA appear to be captured like the CDC and FDA are. I think you need to look into the capture of the EPA and the climate change industry. Just as big pharmaceutical Companies rig their trials to achieve the pre determine outcome the same thing is occurring in climate science. The only studies funded are those that fit the pre approved narrative. Therefore the statement that the science is settled is a lie just as is the statement that the MRNA shots were safe and effective.
To earn my vote for President you will need to clarify that your not opposed to the continue use of fossil fuels and will oppose any bans on the use of the internal combustion engine. That fossil fuels have propelled billions out of poverty and early deaths and that they will continue to be vital to our economic success. That you will never impose a massive cost on the American people by banning cheap and plentiful fossil fuels that the only way to help raise people out of poverty will be fossil fuels and the economic growth that comes from their use. That you will dismantle the same agencies that continue to fund only research that supports a narrative which is anti-scientific.
I'll second that call for more clarity on his stance on combustible fuels (oil, gas and coal). I saw the para about eliminating subsidies on oil and coal. That's fine. How about curtailing those subsidies (and agency/corporate capture) carved out for the so-called 'green' energy sources and products?
Each electric car reportedly gets about $50,000 in subsidies. The lifetime environmental costs per vehicle end up being MORE than a Toyota Corolla or Matrix.
Gee, let me guess whose funding those subsidies...me and thee! Not to mention the overall environmental factor. I'm all for exploring and implementing new technologies that MAY bring a net environmental benefit when matured.
Let the market decide.
Do you know what the overall subsidies are and have been for big oil? The military industrial complex is built on the oil capture model. These policies, that serve the top, have curtailed progress in alternatives greatly. If we had an equal playing field, green would win hands down. We currently do not have the grid needed to transport alternative energy, which RFK wants to invest in. The way electric costs have risen, we should all be in favor of cheaper options,
Let's not subsidize, OK?
The two comments above me said it all. I’m just here for another comment saying the same. Subsidies are garbage. Let the market decide.
Let the market decide.
Agreed. It’s not enough to change around the leadership in these agencies. They need to be dismantled and their responsibilities removed from the fed and returned to the states.
DJT is your guy.
No Donald failed his exam during COVID-19. He had his shot and he blew it. Yes the deep state lied to him. But it was in the end his call on the lockdowns and warp speed and both were failures. Donnie tried to bullshit his way out of Covid because that is what he does. Something’s like COVID-19 needed true wisdom which Donnie doesn’t have. Don’t shot the messenger I vote for him twice only because Hilary is the evil and vile person on this earth and FJB is all you need to know.
To earn my vote for President you will need to clarify that your not opposed to the continue use of fossil fuels and will oppose any bans on the use of the internal combustion engine. That fossil fuels have propelled billions out of poverty and early deaths and that they will continue to be vital to our economic success. That you will never impose a massive cost on the American people by banning cheap and plentiful fossil fuels that the only way to help raise people out of poverty will be fossil fuels and the economic growth that comes from their use.
Yeah he's your guy
The jury is still out on RFK jr. If he is in the climate change camp and continues down this destructive path Biden is on.
Nope.
You should pay better attention.
He's your guy
I’d like to know his opinion on GeoEngineering… which is the REAL threat to our climate and humanity. TPTB want to tap into a new trillion dollar industry of controlling the weather- as if they were God. That’s the real threat to humanity, in my opinion. NO MORE seeding of the clouds… which is changing weather patterns dramatically! And no more weather experimentation on the globe.
Disband DARPA!!!!
He had an interview with Dean Wiggington of geoengineering watch some time back which would be worth looking at again.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bqSkbHKSnjI
Thanks for the info to link
You're most welcome!
Absolutely, this is causing horrific evils,I am a targeted individual from all that nanotechnology sprayed over our home for decades.
Agree on agencies and regenerative practices. Disagree on CO2/("carbon" as the brainwashed say) has anything to do with climate change and in fact is of major importance to the health of our planet. Dont try to reduce CO2. Dont believe the corporate science or media. Listen to all the Noble Lauriate scientists who have been censored.
I doubt RFK is deluded by the corporate science. If anyone knows how science is corrupted it’s RFK.
Todd, agreed! I just posted on another comment, but you may appreciate my work on climate change:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-climate-change-is-wrong-dangerous
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-hidden-profits-of-climate-change
CARBON DIOXIDE GOES IN THE PLANTS, AND THEN OXYGEN IS RELEASED FROM THE PLANTS. WITHOUT CARBON DIOXIDE, THEY CANNOT EXIST AND WE CANNOT EXIST BECAUSE WE NEED THE OXYGEN THEY RELEASE = PHOTOSYNTHESIS ...
Sadly, what some Americans want is a PERFECT candidate. We'll never have that. Mr Kennedy, however, is very close, esp with this, his environmental agenda. He is spot on about regenerative farming, healing soils and ecosystems damaged by industrial agriculture, and localizing solutions. Whether liberal or conservative, we can all participate, esp at the local level by livingwelllocally.substack.com
"May the road rise up to meet us all" when we work together to heal people, places, and planet.
and the other 2 are senile old men.
Get closer to perfect.
DJT 2024
As I've been saying for a while now, "Anyone who is not in love with the natural world does not get my vote."
“I think we need to take back our language. I want to call my organic carrots ‘carrots’ and let [other farmers] call theirs "a chemical carrot".
- Mary Jane Butters, Organic Farmer
To all interested in some alternative views on climate; I'm a Belgian subscriber.
RFK calls climate change a serious problem. I wonder why? His background and understanding of Globalist lies would give me another impression.
Therefore I invite everyone to please, please carefully read the Clintel.org peer-review of the IPCC AR6 report, "the fozen views of the IPCC". Next fact-check it or have it done, even more truly and carefully than you read it, and you probably will never believe the IPCC, UN, and many others ever again.
Clintel peer review of the IPCC AR6 is subscribed and endorsed by a group of well over 1650 impartial scientists, amongst 2 true Nobel prize winners. One of them is the 2022 Nobel prize winner for phisics John Clauser, subscribing and endorsing Clintel's work. The 1650 are all graduates, Phd's, professors, or otherwise honoured and celebrated, unlike the IPCC pseudo-"top-scientists" that count some 400 lead-autors and 800 non graduates, even a more than fair portion of 1st year uniev students.
J.Clauser supports Clintel's "there is no climate urgency" after studying their IPCC AR6 critical review report. John Clauser now is deplatformed, defamed, de-everythinged, .... same as JFK jr and Clintel themselves ofcourse. They also are not welcome anymore in the same places.
The document from Clintel.org: "the fozen views of the IPCC".
I whish you all, all the love and wisedom in the world.
With many warm regards,
No doubt, those people will be called to advise.
I look forward to you banning Fluoridation in USA and all of its occupied territories, including the military bases and assets. The FAN legal case against EPA was started in 2016 and still going!
I’ve not heard him talk about this issue, but he should look into this in his mission of understanding the causes of chronic disease. It’s rather bizarre that we ingest an industrial waste for whiter, stronger teeth;))
Thank you ,we need you .The horrible changing of our atmosphere through government manipulation with nanoparticulants and toxic metals. This is changing humans and animals blood, from breathing this stuff in and eating the foods ,drinking the water.We need the spraying if toxic chemicals to stop. I believe if you use this as your cause , you could very well win.
The "left" has been fear mongering about the environment for 50+ years...New York was going to be flooded by the year 2000...lying for so long about so many things. Using flawed environmental models, ignoring any and all evidence that contradicted or threatened to expose their lies.
Sorry Mr. Kennedy...while you may be running as an "Independent" you really are just another liberal democrat. I'm done.
RFK,Jr, thank you for your panel of farmers, agriculturists, and other professionals (I think about 15 or more), presented this spring. It demonstrates your incredible ability to find people with the know how that includes cleaning our soil, water and air; producing healthy food (nature's medicine); and creating more profit for farmers and their staff. That we can provide Mexico with non-gmo seed, make millions for our farmers and yet our government won't allow it, crazy! God bless!
And we need to stop Gates’ ridiculous practice of blocking the sun with chemicals.
For a thoroughgoing deconstruction of climate-change alarmism, readers might like this post in The Menelaus Gambit: https://ernestdlieberman.substack.com/p/climate-change-alarmists-ignore-how
Excellent essay! It's tough trying to "thread the needle" on the topic, especially on climate change (hopefully he'll do the same with Gaza?). Way back in 1988, before it got political, I studied the subject in an U of M biology class. Then, and now, I believe the evidence supports it being a serious problem. I've lived in Michigan for almost 60 years, it's clear that the climate has started going off the rails (crazy hot summers, winters whipsawing between warm and cold). Unfortunately, many in the health freedom movement who were right on Covid, have failed to apply the same skepticism toward those downplaying the issue. Just like Big Pharma pushed bad "science" for profit, Big Oil has done the same with climate change propaganda to protect their profits. Everyone needs to do their own research and explore both sides of the issue.
Agreed folks should do their own research. Would also argue that the 'green' industry, along with all their backers from - WHO, WEF, Gates etc, have also bought and disseminated substantial amounts of biased propaganda in favor of their so called green 'solutions'.
Big Green is population control.
I'm not a fan of top-down WEF/WHO "solutions" to climate change. I would prefer the CCL"s (Citizens's Climate Lobby) proposal for putting a price on carbon pollution and returning the proceeds directly to the citizens.
I can’t deny my lying eyes. I live on the coast not far from Cape Cod, where RFK grew up, The flooding events are now routine. Our beaches are gone at high tide. Something has happened. My instincts tell me that most of this is coming from natural cycles, although excessive carbon can cause warming. So do acidic oceans and decimating forests. I think he wants to focus most on clean up and regeneration, which is good all the way around. He also wants to build the grid to transport new energy technologies, which is also only good. From my cursory study on this issue, we should be seriously looking at the incoming ice age and start preparing for life and food production indoors. It may be a long time from now, or it may come rapidly, but come it will, according to many scientists.