92 Comments

I'm all for cleaning up, mostly getting rid of, unnecessary agencies. Our farmers already practice regenerative farming and no farmer needs the government telling him how to work HIS OWN LAND. Feel free to eliminate government but leave the climate to God seeing as how He is the one who is in control of it and everything else.

Expand full comment

Do you think the biggest agri farms, supported by Monsanto, glyphosates and GMO’s are regenerative? 95% of our corn and soy is now gmo. Those are the practices that benefit a few at the top and are harming our soils, water, eco systems and human health. When 1:2 children are medicated for chronic illness and half of our population is obese, something, that affects and costs us all, has gone terribly wrong. Don’t you think we should right this sinking ship?

Expand full comment

Not part of the president's job. People need to be the one's to insist and demand change directly. Leave the president out of it. Food is medicine. If you're obese or sick change your diet. As long as people listen to the government about how to live this is what happens. When people use their own brain and decide for themselves then maybe things will change.

Expand full comment

Back on March 9, 2023 I did a video presentation on "Preparing Your Kitchen Garden" for CHD's "Attack on Food" Symposium: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/the-attack-on-food-symposium/attack-on-food-john/

I agree that nobody can be forced to be fully responsible, but there is a long, long history of manipulating and parasitizing productive farmers in our world, our USA, and in our lives.

Agribusiness under Kissinger/Nixon/Earl Butz took over, under the mantra of "Get Big or Get Out", so that American farmers could be weaponized against the farmers of the rest of the world, to bankrupt them and force their countries to rely on US grain exports.

This was and is bad for American farmers, also, and many are losing their farms to ever-bigger agribusiness (and Bill Gates), with invisible sources of funding.

All countries need to have sustainable local food security. This needs to stop being a form of warfare against farmers and families.

Additionally, I supported RFK Jr. as early as March of this year, but recently removed my Kennedy 2024 bumper-stickers, due to the immoral support of Genocide against Palestinians by Israeli ultra-nationalist "Revisionist Zionists".

This stance on Occupied-Palestine is out of character with the other stances, all moral, well considered, and adjusted after input and further consideration, which Mr. Kennedy espouses.

Expand full comment

I have no idea why you are even responding to what I said.

Expand full comment

I responded to this statement of yours:

"no farmer needs the government telling him how to work HIS OWN LAND."

Expand full comment

It's a true statement. Sadly, some farmers folded to the gov't. I do know plenty of regenerative farmers. Best place to buy good meat.

Expand full comment

I appreciate that there is one candidate that is talking about regenerative farming and the disgusting mining practices that have been accelerated for the ‘green’ agenda.

There are so many problems and I don’t expect to agree 100% with any candidate.

Expand full comment

I like RFK. I actually discuss him (and a DeSantis in a previous article), but more and more I analyze the election process, I just don’t think the current process will yield any substantial change.

I think it’s best we direct our energies at our local governments -- the ones that we can go right up too if they don’t comply with our votes vs presidential governments that are too big to be held accountable

Here are my articles if interested:

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-we-should-appreciate-desantis

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-we-need-to-stop-voting-in-presidential

Expand full comment

Changing the corporate capture of our agencies will be a titanic shift in the business as usual model. Doing the proper studies to find out what is causing the explosion in chronic disease and obesity in our children is an imperative. Many important changes can and must happen at the top, which RFK can easily accomplish by executive order. But, of course all politics is local too.

Expand full comment

For starters, that's not in the presidents job description. EO's are also unconstitutional.

Expand full comment

The whole ‘reducing CO2’ climate change argument will destroy life on our planet. At what point did we forget elementary school science when we learned that plants use CO2 and turn it into oxygen? Humans need it too. Simple concept. We need more trees and more farms, not less.

What we, the people, really need to do is insist that all of these egotistical, self important globalist types STOP flying around in their private jets. Until they do, people like Bill Gates, should STFU about “climate change” because that alone makes it obvious that it’s not about the planet or people, but CONTROL of us.

Expand full comment

You’re 100% correct. You may like my article about the truth of climate change:

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-climate-change-is-wrong-dangerous

Expand full comment

This is precisely what RFK is trying to stop, the divide, the anger and the paralysis that just keeps the rich getting richer.

Expand full comment

Is RFK jr a proponent of eugenics?

Expand full comment

I am not giving up my car, living in a "15-minute city", accepting a "carbon budget", or eating bugs. But cleaning up rivers and protecting wildlife? Count me in!

Expand full comment

When did these politicians lose their ever loving minds? RFK comes at problems with common sense and real solutions that we can all come together around.

Expand full comment

Mr Kennedy I am a long time independent conservative thinker and voter. I find you to be so much more appealing than the current president and the former President now running for the office again. I however find your views on climate change discouraging. As you say the EPA and USDA appear to be captured like the CDC and FDA are. I think you need to look into the capture of the EPA and the climate change industry. Just as big pharmaceutical Companies rig their trials to achieve the pre determine outcome the same thing is occurring in climate science. The only studies funded are those that fit the pre approved narrative. Therefore the statement that the science is settled is a lie just as is the statement that the MRNA shots were safe and effective.

To earn my vote for President you will need to clarify that your not opposed to the continue use of fossil fuels and will oppose any bans on the use of the internal combustion engine. That fossil fuels have propelled billions out of poverty and early deaths and that they will continue to be vital to our economic success. That you will never impose a massive cost on the American people by banning cheap and plentiful fossil fuels that the only way to help raise people out of poverty will be fossil fuels and the economic growth that comes from their use. That you will dismantle the same agencies that continue to fund only research that supports a narrative which is anti-scientific.

Expand full comment

I'll second that call for more clarity on his stance on combustible fuels (oil, gas and coal). I saw the para about eliminating subsidies on oil and coal. That's fine. How about curtailing those subsidies (and agency/corporate capture) carved out for the so-called 'green' energy sources and products?

Expand full comment

Each electric car reportedly gets about $50,000 in subsidies. The lifetime environmental costs per vehicle end up being MORE than a Toyota Corolla or Matrix.

Expand full comment

Gee, let me guess whose funding those subsidies...me and thee! Not to mention the overall environmental factor. I'm all for exploring and implementing new technologies that MAY bring a net environmental benefit when matured.

Let the market decide.

Expand full comment

Do you know what the overall subsidies are and have been for big oil? The military industrial complex is built on the oil capture model. These policies, that serve the top, have curtailed progress in alternatives greatly. If we had an equal playing field, green would win hands down. We currently do not have the grid needed to transport alternative energy, which RFK wants to invest in. The way electric costs have risen, we should all be in favor of cheaper options,

Expand full comment

Let's not subsidize, OK?

Expand full comment

The two comments above me said it all. I’m just here for another comment saying the same. Subsidies are garbage. Let the market decide.

Expand full comment

Let the market decide.

Expand full comment

Agreed. It’s not enough to change around the leadership in these agencies. They need to be dismantled and their responsibilities removed from the fed and returned to the states.

Expand full comment

DJT is your guy.

Expand full comment

No Donald failed his exam during COVID-19. He had his shot and he blew it. Yes the deep state lied to him. But it was in the end his call on the lockdowns and warp speed and both were failures. Donnie tried to bullshit his way out of Covid because that is what he does. Something’s like COVID-19 needed true wisdom which Donnie doesn’t have. Don’t shot the messenger I vote for him twice only because Hilary is the evil and vile person on this earth and FJB is all you need to know.

Expand full comment

To earn my vote for President you will need to clarify that your not opposed to the continue use of fossil fuels and will oppose any bans on the use of the internal combustion engine. That fossil fuels have propelled billions out of poverty and early deaths and that they will continue to be vital to our economic success. That you will never impose a massive cost on the American people by banning cheap and plentiful fossil fuels that the only way to help raise people out of poverty will be fossil fuels and the economic growth that comes from their use.

Yeah he's your guy

Expand full comment

The jury is still out on RFK jr. If he is in the climate change camp and continues down this destructive path Biden is on.

Expand full comment

Nope.

You should pay better attention.

He's your guy

Expand full comment

I’d like to know his opinion on GeoEngineering… which is the REAL threat to our climate and humanity. TPTB want to tap into a new trillion dollar industry of controlling the weather- as if they were God. That’s the real threat to humanity, in my opinion. NO MORE seeding of the clouds… which is changing weather patterns dramatically! And no more weather experimentation on the globe.

Disband DARPA!!!!

Expand full comment

He had an interview with Dean Wiggington of geoengineering watch some time back which would be worth looking at again.

Expand full comment

Absolutely, this is causing horrific evils,I am a targeted individual from all that nanotechnology sprayed over our home for decades.

Expand full comment

Agree on agencies and regenerative practices. Disagree on CO2/("carbon" as the brainwashed say) has anything to do with climate change and in fact is of major importance to the health of our planet. Dont try to reduce CO2. Dont believe the corporate science or media. Listen to all the Noble Lauriate scientists who have been censored.

Expand full comment

I doubt RFK is deluded by the corporate science. If anyone knows how science is corrupted it’s RFK.

Expand full comment

Sadly, what some Americans want is a PERFECT candidate. We'll never have that. Mr Kennedy, however, is very close, esp with this, his environmental agenda. He is spot on about regenerative farming, healing soils and ecosystems damaged by industrial agriculture, and localizing solutions. Whether liberal or conservative, we can all participate, esp at the local level by livingwelllocally.substack.com

"May the road rise up to meet us all" when we work together to heal people, places, and planet.

Expand full comment

and the other 2 are senile old men.

Expand full comment

Get closer to perfect.

DJT 2024

Expand full comment

Nah

Expand full comment

To all interested in some alternative views on climate; I'm a Belgian subscriber.

RFK calls climate change a serious problem. I wonder why? His background and understanding of Globalist lies would give me another impression.

Therefore I invite everyone to please, please carefully read the Clintel.org peer-review of the IPCC AR6 report, "the fozen views of the IPCC". Next fact-check it or have it done, even more truly and carefully than you read it, and you probably will never believe the IPCC, UN, and many others ever again.

Clintel peer review of the IPCC AR6 is subscribed and endorsed by a group of well over 1650 impartial scientists, amongst 2 true Nobel prize winners. One of them is the 2022 Nobel prize winner for phisics John Clauser, subscribing and endorsing Clintel's work. The 1650 are all graduates, Phd's, professors, or otherwise honoured and celebrated, unlike the IPCC pseudo-"top-scientists" that count some 400 lead-autors and 800 non graduates, even a more than fair portion of 1st year uniev students.

J.Clauser supports Clintel's "there is no climate urgency" after studying their IPCC AR6 critical review report. John Clauser now is deplatformed, defamed, de-everythinged, .... same as JFK jr and Clintel themselves ofcourse. They also are not welcome anymore in the same places.

The document from Clintel.org: "the fozen views of the IPCC".

I whish you all, all the love and wisedom in the world.

With many warm regards,

Expand full comment

No doubt, those people will be called to advise.

Expand full comment

As I've been saying for a while now, "Anyone who is not in love with the natural world does not get my vote."

“I think we need to take back our language. I want to call my organic carrots ‘carrots’ and let [other farmers] call theirs "a chemical carrot".

- Mary Jane Butters, Organic Farmer

Expand full comment

I look forward to you banning Fluoridation in USA and all of its occupied territories, including the military bases and assets. The FAN legal case against EPA was started in 2016 and still going!

Expand full comment

I’ve not heard him talk about this issue, but he should look into this in his mission of understanding the causes of chronic disease. It’s rather bizarre that we ingest an industrial waste for whiter, stronger teeth;))

Expand full comment

Yes Bobby please stop geoengineering as part of your cleanup plan

Expand full comment

I think he’s still on a learning curve with geo engineering (aren’t we all). I have heard him say it is likely doing more harm than good. He’ll surround himself with people that will give him all sides on these issues and his instincts are remarkable.

Expand full comment

The "left" has been fear mongering about the environment for 50+ years...New York was going to be flooded by the year 2000...lying for so long about so many things. Using flawed environmental models, ignoring any and all evidence that contradicted or threatened to expose their lies.

Sorry Mr. Kennedy...while you may be running as an "Independent" you really are just another liberal democrat. I'm done.

Expand full comment

Thank you ,we need you .The horrible changing of our atmosphere through government manipulation with nanoparticulants and toxic metals. This is changing humans and animals blood, from breathing this stuff in and eating the foods ,drinking the water.We need the spraying if toxic chemicals to stop. I believe if you use this as your cause , you could very well win.

Expand full comment

RFK,Jr, thank you for your panel of farmers, agriculturists, and other professionals (I think about 15 or more), presented this spring. It demonstrates your incredible ability to find people with the know how that includes cleaning our soil, water and air; producing healthy food (nature's medicine); and creating more profit for farmers and their staff. That we can provide Mexico with non-gmo seed, make millions for our farmers and yet our government won't allow it, crazy! God bless!

Expand full comment

For a thoroughgoing deconstruction of climate-change alarmism, readers might like this post in The Menelaus Gambit: https://ernestdlieberman.substack.com/p/climate-change-alarmists-ignore-how

Expand full comment