New polls show a massive groundswell of support for my independent presidential campaign, which has sent shockwaves through the two major parties and the mainstream media. According to a new national poll by Quinnipiac University, I beat Trump and Biden among voters ages 18-34
I wear one of my Kennedy 2024 t-shirts whenever going to a large public place. I only get smiles, fist pumps and friendly comments. I never get hostile comments anywhere. This is because your favorability ratio is vastly higher than the other two.
And now you are getting an awesome increase in support!
Same here. I have a pin on my purse that I actually forget is there, but people always remind me of it with their positive comments. And I purposely wear my shirt to large events and crowded areas and the response has always been positive, along with some curiosity from folks who don’t yet realize he’s running. It feels so good to be boots on the ground!
Same here, a pin on my purse always and wearing a hat and t-shirt to all large gatherings and events and stickers on my car bumpers. The response is always positive…”love your shirt”, “love him, wish he were running.” I love responding, “he is, independent, check out Kennedy24.com!”
Don't worry. Robert Kennedy has no path to victory because he is not running a serious campaign, just a con game to cheat small donors out of their money and to get personal attention.
Jimmy Dore is one of the best barometers for antiwar pols. Unfortunately I've yet to see a pol (RFK's former campaign manager maybe DK?) stay on the correct side of the Jimmy Dore test. EVEN if they manage to keep Trump off the ballot, RFK Jr. wins few Trump supporters with his swampy war rhetoric.
Netanyahu is the wild card. He brags about his complete mRNA data base & first dibs for two years on new products. He made his citizens the pilot & many there know. Late 2019 he restated he would need Hamas. Large protests daily just prior to Hamas attack re his move to take control of the judges. He’s in office yet facing serious crimes. It’s all horrific & wish Kennedy could have found more balance.
rfk jr shot himself in the foot by taking a side and by remaining absolutely silent about the Palestinian issue. not a smart move to take a side. that's why Kucinich and so many top staff left his campaign. meanwhile, people are being slaughtered the conflict is horrendous on both sides and if you look at his daily posts on twitter there is no mention of the pressing issue taking place currently but a repeat of stuff we have hear over and over again. i love the one about what childhood pets he had. very appropriate for a presidential candidate to post about during a time like this. No mention at all about the one issue that most of the world is focusing on--very sad.
Mujama al-Islamiya later became Hamas before Intifada-I was launched in December 1987. Israel considered Mujama al-Islamiya and its successor organisation Hamas a lesser evil as compared to PLO and thought that dividing Palestinians will serve the interest of Jewish state. If Israel termed PLO a terrorist organisation and a major threat to its interests, Hamas was also against PLO because of its secular and nationalist outlook. That is how both Hamas and Israel were viewed as natural allies against PLO. But, later on when Hamas in 1988 killed two Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) personnel in Gaza, Israel turned against Hamas but it was too late. Hamas, which earlier labelled itself as a welfare and charity organization in Gaza and got favors from Israel, changed is tactics and exploited PLO’s peace process with Israel to gain popular support of those Palestinians who were disillusioned with Yasser Arafat’s mending of fences with the Jewish state despite the killing of hundreds of Palestinians in Intifada-I. Regrets among those Israeli officials who helped the creation of Hamas are well documented.
Hamas is mostly funded by Qatar, one of the US most loyal ally in the Middle East. Israel needs an adversary like Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc, to have an excuse to escalate against all the Palestinians, and to “play” victim in the eyes of the world. Hamas itself is not a monolithic organization but rather comprised of many factions, so it’s not clear, can it be controlled from one center or not. Time will tell who will benefit from this conflict. Will Israel be able to cleanse the Gaza? Next year, the concessions for the natural gas exploitation is due to expire, and Gazprom has already made an offer to the Palestinians to take over from British. Also, it’s not a coincidence that Israel is leveling the northern part of Gaza. This is the pathway of the “Ben Gurion Canal”, which is a part of IMEC. Israel would not be able to escalate this way without an incident of such scope and scale to serve as a pretext. Anyway, the humanitarian tragedy of the innocent civilians is enormous.
Iran was re-armed with nuclear and Hamas was re-activated during Trump administration. These are not arguments to justify terrorism.
Kennedy supports Palestine cause, not Hamas cause
"I support the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people. These need not be mutually exclusive. Already, there are many areas of cooperation between Israelis and Palestinians that go unnoticed. It’s time for the Palestinian leadership to recognize Israel as the nation state and homeland of the Jewish people and for the Israeli leadership to re-offer a two-state solution with safe and secure borders." - RFK Jr
Iran doesn’t have a nuclear weapon. Iran’s nuclear program is non-belligerent and the enrichment level is very far from being military grade.
On the other hand, Israel has nuclear warheads and from time to time Israeli politicians allude to this fact.
RFK’s position on the Middle East and Eurasia is the same as the Neocons. The same rhetorics: Axis of evil, Control over oil, Israel as an American airplane carrier, etc.
By the way, it’s not upon Israeli leadership to “offer a two-state solution”. There are already several UN resolutions on this matter, which has been ignored by Israel and the US for decades. It’s not the Palestinians who steal the Israeli land, occupy the Golan Heights and parts of Lebanon, and keep Israeli women and children in prisons.
Must Zionist always lie? You are deliberately reframing the issue from a naked act of aggression to "self-defense", and a stance of anti-genocide to supporting Hamas.
"Zionist" always lie? Like "blacks" steal? or "Irish" drink? Showing a little bias perhaps? Here's some info on "zionism" for the sake of actual facts & knowledge: https://www.prageru.com/video/zionism-why-all-the-controversy. There are other sources besides Prager U, but they are comprehensive and fact-based.
In my experience, people simply reject the source of information when the information doesn't agree with their pre-existing ideas. So, likely anything that explains the history in an academic way, like in the video, will strike you as biased. So, essentially the answer...for you...is no.
Zionists aren’t a race. It’s more like saying “Scientologists always lie” or “communists always lie” or “Nazis always lie.” In fact the equation of Zionists to race is a lie. EG “anti-Zionism is anti-semitism” is a slanderous lie.
I think it’s false that “Zionists always lie”, but you just did in the comparison you made. Or maybe you are just ignorantly spreading a lie? Showing a little bias?
Not sure what your point is. MY point was making broad condemning statements about groups of people is....you fill in the epithet. Last time I looked "Irish" aren't a race. So your point is...fill in the eptithet. Being "anti-zionist" isn't "anti-semitic" unless it is. When I see people protesting "anti-whatever other country." I'll know it isn't "anti-semitic". FYI: https://www.prageru.com/video/the-middle-east-problem
I've been concerned about this issue and I've been going back-and-forth as I listen to different commentators. Someone made a point that hadn't really occurred to me previously. Although I think Israel's right to the land that they took from the Palestinians in 1948 is quite questionable, the fact remains that the modern Palestinians and their leadership are fundamentalist zealots who do not believe in any of the human rights we cherish in the west, especially women's rights. They would happily take the entire world back to the eighth century if they could. So, regardless of how wrong Israel is in so many ways, It's bizarre to see liberals supporting Hamas. They are not the way they are because of Israel. They are the way they are because scorpions are the way they are.
The Israeli's did not "take" the land from the Palestinians. That's simply false. Here's some history & facts & RFKJ is on the right side of this issues, just like he is on all the others. https://www.prageru.com/video/israels-legal-founding
I would like to see you in the Oval Office. In order to ensure this outcome, I recommend that you immediately and thoroughly explain your support of Bill Ackman's open letter to the President of Harvard. Although some parts of his long missive are sensical and in alignment with your platform, others are not, specifically his recommendations to:
1) Not wait for police review of a situation involving the assault of an HBS student before taking disciplinary action against the alleged assailants
2)Take disciplinary action against students for expressing their individual opinions in open protest or on Slack message boards
3) Make such disciplinary actions part of a student's permanent record with lifelong repercussions because "No law firm, corporation or graduate program will hire or admit an antisemitic or racist student"
Are you REALLY condoning such measures? Guilty until proven otherwise? Disciplining those who express unsavory opinions? Destroying a young person's career path as a means of setting an example so that others will never cross the line with regard to what can be expressed?
How can you be a true defender of the First Amendment if you balk at supporting those who espouse ideas you find repugnant? You are coming across as a censor.
You Tweeted: "It’s time to hold college administrations responsible for the epidemic of campus antisemitism by insisting on zero-tolerance policies."
Is that really the solution? Having zero-tolerance policies? This is completely antithetical to your entire campaign, the "show me where I have gotten it wrong", your lawsuit against the Biden Administration, your testimony in open session on censorship.
Do you seriously believe the way to eliminate an idea is to crush those who express it? Hasn't history proven the opposite? Isn't it better to offer the so-called "anti-Semites" a seat at the table so their views can be expressed and be dismantled publicly? Or is this only acceptable when it comes to vaccine-science? These are the kinds of discussions college administrations should be defending in the hope that their students leave with prepared minds and attitudes.
Please articulate your ideas on this soon. Your silence may ultimately undermine your "path to victory". Any reasonable opponent on a debate stage will have no problem showing how your experiment in telling the American people the truth is just more hypocrisy.
He made it CLEAR he was talking about those that are bullying others with speech to incite harm to them. I totally agree with him! Free speech should never include inciting violence towards others.
I totally agree and I have stop supporting him. His actions are in direction contradiction to what he has been saying for months. He is not a peace candidate, he is a status quo neo con when it comes to Israel. I was shocked by both his actions and lack thereof. i don't see him changing his stance nor do i think he can regain those who have rescinded their support. he shot himself in the foot, you are 100% correct in that he has joined the lobby for Israel even while the people and children of Gaza are being slaughtered and denied the most basic human needs, such as food, water, electricity, medicine, anesthesia and shelter. How he can be so silent is shocking to me, how he is not calling for a cease fire and supporting the need for humanitarian assistance for the people of Gaza is frightening. He has not shown any concern for the horrific bombardment and loss of life in Gaza, he has been silent regarding these people. He is not the man he tried to make us think he was. He is not a peace candidate, he is not for ending forever wars and the industrial military complex. He has walked right into the good guys (Israel), bad guys (Palestinians) trope, something he has speaken out against and now he has embraced it . He is showing that even as an independent candidate he won't buck the system when it comes to this conflict, so he is no different than anyone democrat or republican in our government. If he can't do it on this very pressing humanitarian issue where human beings are being slaughtered in unthinkable numbers, then why would I think he won't do the same on other issues. If genocide doesn't move him as a human being to speak out for what is right, than what does that say about him and his courage?
You must have missed a part of his peace speech where he said "not to say we should ignore the real dangers of the world"
Hamas wants to "sacrifice women and children (of Palestine) to spur jihad around the world, eradicate all jews and christians, and Allah will be the only God everyone will worship."
I'll leave you to decide if Israel should risk October 7 "again and again a million times"
At first I only listened to those that are pro Palestine UNTIL I SAW AND HEARD protestors celebrating what Hamas did to civilians. That was disgusting and I would say the same about anyone that celebrated the loss of civilian lives. That is when I decided to research both sides including reading the Hamas Charter which clearly shows they are the ones with the intentions of genocide and learning what you wrote about how Hamas sacrifices civilians while Israel warns them. It's good to read comments like yours that knows what Hamas is really all about. Israel has the right to defend themselves. It's sad any loss of civilian lives on either side but Israel doesn't target them like Hamas does.
No, but if I heard they did I would say the same thing that's disgusting! Were they cheering for Hamas to be eliminated or civilians, too? It's disgusting for anyone to celebrate the loss of civilian lives but I know that is not Israel's position to target civilians! But it is what Hamas does.
Obviously you and so many like you do not know it's Hamas that wants genocide of all Jews! Read the Hamas Charter.
Also, I agree with this quote from the son of a Hamas leader.....
"Hamas started this war. This is not their first war against Israel. We have previous wars where they initiated the war against Israel and the world and the global public bent so fast and they begged for a cease fire in the past 3 wars against Hamas and Israel had to submit to public opinion and we did not finish them in the precious 3 wars every time Hamas came back stronger and this time the voices rise again asking to stop and cease the fire. What will happen tomorrow if they cease fire now? The job is not finished. This problem has been going on for 35 years..." "Israel says evacuate civilians leaflets through media give them opportunity of 20 days to evacuate but they didn't. They still give shelter to Hamas. In this case Israel is not responsible tor any harm that happens to civilians..."
Hamas is irrelevant. If there was no Hamas then there would be another fundamentalist group. All these extremist groups were created to counter Soviet influence in the Middle East, because back then PLO was leftist organization. Egypt, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria were close to USSR as well. Hence the CIA has facilitated the founding of various groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, Hamas, etc to destabilize the countries and movements. Divide and conquer, simple as that. Now it’s out of control, because it’s not possible to control the terrorists.
I believe what I SEE AND HEAR and what the Hamas Charter reads. While there are extremists in all countries including here Israel does not target civilians. They warned them and told them where to go to safety. If they don't it's not on Israel. Hamas kept some of them from leaving. That is on Hamas!
There would be no Hamas if there is no reason for its existence, such as the occupation of the Palestine, South Lebanon or Golan, or for example forceful spreading of the settlements, apartheid, deprivation of the basic human rights etc.
I have not had time to research this quote so I can neither verify OR deny but if it's true it sure debunks the Palestine claims to Israel's land.
"1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state 2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state. 4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Arab-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state. 5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state. 6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state. 7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state. 8. Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state. 9. Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state. 10. Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state. 12. Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state. 13. Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state. 14. Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state. 15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state. 16. Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state. 17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 18. Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 19. Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state. 20. Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE."
History does not give the rights to anyone to be a hegemon. All around the world there are examples of creation of countries and even nations out of nothing. Just because some powers had a “great idea”. Ukrainians, Bosnians, Macedonians, Kosovars etc did not exist before the 20th century. They were invented out of someone’s interest. How were the borders drawn? Great powers again. Without any concern to the local people. How did UK and France divided the Arabian Peninsula after the WW1? To be easier to manipulate them, etc. But now, it is what it is. The peace is the most important thing. There can be no peace if it’s unjust and dictated by one force.
The Hamas Charter makes it clear they do not want peace!
Saudi Arabia’s former ambassador to the US Prince Bandar bin Sultan has called out the Palestinian leadership for its rejection of the UAE-Israel peace deal.
The word Palestine is a placeholder, there were Arabs in "Palestine" for thousands of years.
"10,000 years ago, a squirrel could travel to California to Texas without touching the ground because there were so many trees."
I am not saying the state of California or Texas existed 10,000 years ago, the word California and Texas means the geographic land mass that is known as California and Texas today.
You r right. I am confused...i missed all of the rant. I will remove the post. I just shocked myself by realizing that there may not be any difference between the two. Ugg. We really are screwed.
I don't care how much ill-informed people ask him to do the wrong thing. Many of you probably thought he was crazy about covid but he had the right information and full information, you didn't. You were reacting out of emotion based on the propaganda you were being fed. He is not going to.
Also, you are clearly mischaracterizing his position, ignoring all the things he has said warning against escalation, condemning Netanyahu for injuring Israel's moral case and condemning Israel's actions on the West Bank.
Like JFK and RFK Sr, who both fought in WW2 and were around when Palestine Grand Mufti helped Hitler design the final solution in 1941, RFK Jr will always support the right of Israel to exist.
There was a ceasefire until Hamas broke it, killed civilians, including killing a father, raping the mother while burning her baby in an oven (this is not a fake story, myself and others have seen proof on Telegram and Israel has produced autopsy report).
Israel has been broadcasting messages before targeting Hamas operations. Hamas traps civilians in those buildings not allowing civilians to leave while they take cover in the tunnels. They haven't built any bomb shelters for civilians.
The leader of Hamas, who is worth $5 billion and living in Qatar, has said that they want to "sacrifice women and children to spur jihad around the world, eradicate all jews and christians, and Allah will be the only God everyone will worship."
Until Hamas no longer exists, there cannot be peace. How do you live with a neighbor who thinks you should not even exist? Israel gave complete autonomy to Palestine in 2005. Hamas immediately moved in, burned every aid and infrastructure Israel had given, destroyed all the greenhouses, declared war on Israel and used all the money they were getting in international aid to build rockets and tunnels instead of improving the lives of Gazans.
Before you say Israel is occupying, Israel was on that land 1700 years before Muhammad invented Islam, and they've been repeatedly displaced from their land starting with the Roman empire. Palestine on the other hand was never a country at any point in history. 93% of Palestine arabs in Jerusalem prefer Israeli rule over PA. That's according to Palestine state media poll!
Anyone who brands themselves a peace activist, propose a solution for Hamas. Until you are able to, your opinion is best kept to yourself. No one wants any more virtue signaling or soundbites. FWIW, I believe Bobby has been talking to a lot of people to get different perspectives about the situation.
"And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular – but one must take it simply because it is right." MLK
I think the media is unknowingly contributing to this effort by calling you an anti-vaxxer. Its the younger voters, who have been force-vaxxed by the "Biden" administration, who are sick to death of seeing themselves and their friends jabbed literally to death, just to attend university and live normal working lives.
Not that you're a one-issue candidate, but both "Biden" and Trump are pro-vax, and I predict this "vax safety" position of yours will become more and more of a hidden advantage as time passes - kind of like the Vietnam War became a severe disadvantage with younger voters in 1968.
Meanwhile, the media has absolutely no clue - because they just aren't very bright. I hope they keep up with the 'anti-vax' thing. Think of it as a campaign contribution each time they do it. The more the media attacks you on this issue, the more the younger voters will trust you. Who wants to be jabbed to death? Not them.
I've never been excited about any candidate in my life. This is the first time I feel any excitement about an election. Fck the media. Fck the uniparty propaganda. Let's go over the frickin' wall!
Happy to see this and encourage you stay on the amazing path you are taking now. One thing I would suggest is to respond immediately with facts and data to any spurious claims made about your policies and beliefs so that your supporters can squelch those intentional false rumors immediately.
your path to victory DOES NOT INCLUDE cheering on GENOCIDE. Thanks to your regurgitation of Israeli PROPAGANDA about the 'mid east' 'conflict' we have no REAL peace/antiwar candidate. How do you go from warning about ww3 and wasted lives in ukraine to supporting the country that operates the worlds largest CONCENTRAITION CAMP in their effort to ELIMINATE their enemies ?
The Hamas Charter makes it crystal clear they are the ones supporting genocide!
"Hamas started this war. This is not their first war against Israel. We have previous wars where they initiated the war against Israel and the world and the global public bent so fast and they begged for a cease fire in the past 3 wars against Hamas and Israel had to submit to public opinion and we did not finish them in the precious 3 wars every time Hamas came back stronger and this time the voices rise again asking to stop and cease the fire. What will happen tomorrow if they cease fire now? The job is not finished. This problem has been going on for 35 years..." "Israel says evacuate civilians leaflets through media give them opportunity of 20 days to evacuate but they didn't. They still give shelter to Hamas. In this case Israel is not responsible tor any harm that happens to civilians..."
Mosab Hassan Yousef who is the son of a Hamas founding leader.
"according to documentation collected by Defense for Children International" I would want to know where they got that documentation from? As I wrote there are extremists everywhere even here and if that's true those Israel forces involved should be condemned, tried and convicted.
Lets not forget the reporting that has been debunked such as it got reported Israel bombed a hospital but then we learn it was one of Hamas weapons that fell short of its target and got the hospital so I definitely don't trust anything that comes from Hamas! The Hamas Charter is very clear what their intentions are.
"...in the Hamas Constitution they say that Jihad is the path and dying for God is their greatest wish"
"the Israeli Declaration of Independence it says we extend our hand to all neighboring states and their peoples in neighboring states and their peoples in neighborliness can you hear the difference between the Muslims and the Jews between we want to die in Jihad and we offer our hand in peace this is important because the Palestinians live by their values..." Oren Cahanovitc
you really ned to do some research. first of all gaza is the largest open air prison on the planet and what we just witnessed was a prison break. israelis were and are starving them by calculating how many calories just above starvation to allow in. They also created and have funded hamas. Lots of israelis say that the idf stood down for 6 hours and let it happen. One big reason is the oil and gas reserves off gaza coast that they would have to share the profits of. of course these israelis are like any capitalist ass and CANNOT SHARE....https://substack.com/home/post/p-138832644?source=queue
Oh, I have done my research now and on both sides! I didn't to start with. I kept listening to everyone that's pro Hamas until I saw and heard things that made me decide I would research both sides.
Hamas founder’s son says ‘barbaric’ group must be removed from power | Cuomo
Mosab Hassan Yousef who is the son of a Hamas founding leader
"Hamas started this war. This is not their first war against Israel. We have previous wars where they initiated the war against Israel and the world and the global public bent so fast and they begged for a cease fire in the past 3 wars against Hamas and Israel had to submit to public opinion and we did not finish them in the precious 3 wars every time Hamas came back stronger and this time the voices rise again asking to stop and cease the fire. What will happen tomorrow if they cease fire now? The job is not finished. This problem has been going on for 35 years..." "Israel says evacuate civilians leaflets through media give them opportunity of 20 days to evacuate but they didn't. They still give shelter to Hamas. In this case Israel is not responsible tor any harm that happens to civilians..."
Mosab Hassan Yousef who is the son of a Hamas founding leader.
Saudi Arabia’s former ambassador to the US Prince Bandar bin Sultan has called out the Palestinian leadership for its rejection of the UAE-Israel peace deal.
"...in the Hamas Constitution they say that Jihad is the path and dying for God is their greatest wish"
"the Israeli Declaration of Independence it says we extend our hand to all neighboring states and their peoples in neighboring states and their peoples in neighborliness can you hear the difference between the Muslims and the Jews between we want to die in Jihad and we offer our hand in peace this is important because the Palestinians live by their values..." Oren Cahanovitc
Mujama al-Islamiya later became Hamas before Intifada-I was launched in December 1987. Israel considered Mujama al-Islamiya and its successor organisation Hamas a lesser evil as compared to PLO and thought that dividing Palestinians will serve the interest of Jewish state. If Israel termed PLO a terrorist organisation and a major threat to its interests, Hamas was also against PLO because of its secular and nationalist outlook. That is how both Hamas and Israel were viewed as natural allies against PLO. But, later on when Hamas in 1988 killed two Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) personnel in Gaza, Israel turned against Hamas but it was too late. Hamas, which earlier labelled itself as a welfare and charity organization in Gaza and got favors from Israel, changed is tactics and exploited PLO’s peace process with Israel to gain popular support of those Palestinians who were disillusioned with Yasser Arafat’s mending of fences with the Jewish state despite the killing of hundreds of Palestinians in Intifada-I. Regrets among those Israeli officials who helped the creation of Hamas are well documented.
My definition of any bill that can stop OUR involvement in any war that is vetoed is certainly not someone that is anti war. Having the position of our troops being in some wars but not others it not an anti war position but feel free to put whatever definition on that you want.
I’ve had quite a few trips around the sun and have to say I’ve never been this excited about a political campaign. (Your father would’ve been my guy had I been alive and old enough to vote for him!) Thank you for giving me a reason to care, a reason to have hope. Thank you for focusing on what’s going on in the US, first and foremost.
Trolls are gonna troll, it’s fun to block them on your posts. No candidate who wants to win will come out against Israel. I believe In your heart you know what needs to be done and believe you’ll handle things appropriately when in office.
You’ve got this, Bobby (Mr. President). Momentum is on your side, clearly. Remember to “never stop never stopping.” 🗡️❤️
Look, let me say this - you are my second choice for president right now. DJT is first. Biden is 3rd, but above West and Stein.
However, I will go back to a point I made to my friends in 1992 -lets say you do win in a 3 way race. You will have no congressional support. 435 Democratic/Republican congresspersons, and 100 DNC/GOP senators will all oppose you (ok maybe you get the 2 "independent" candidates but thy are democrats we all know it it).
So I do truly ask you, Mr. Kennedy - how will you get anything done? Congress will have zero interest in assisting you on passing any legislation. And please don't pretend they will do it "in the national interest" when we watched Ms. Pelosi refuse to give Trump his infrastructure bill because she knew it would help him, instead hoping a democrat would be elected and giving that success to them (which is what happened), or Senator McConnell deny Obama a supreme court justice hoping a republican would win (which happened)(. They will just wait you out.
Imagine a supreme court justice appointment. Which party is going to rally to your side? Unless that justice come out and swears on a stack of aborted babies they will support abortion again, the Democrats will not back them (because they have no proof that the justice will back their causes) nor will the Republicans either. And let's be honest - we know that is how they think. They all know how the newest justice will vote 90-95% of the times (there are a few curve balls, but democrats know that democratic appointed justices will support democratic sides in supreme court cases - as will the GOP).
What do you honestly expect to get passed? Spending cuts? Nope. Tax increases? Nope. Social spending? Nope. I don't even truly know if you will get a cabinet confirmed. Imagine the 10,000 other executive appointments needing congressional approval. Think they will be falling over themselves to back your appointment? Don't make me laugh.
It is in no one's political interest to help you. It may be in the country's, but no one in Washington cares what the country wants/needs/thinks.
So voting for you is really voting for no action by the government for 4 years. I am not opposed to that, but your only course of doing anything will be executive order, which will be overcome the day you leave.
So someone tell me why this is a good idea, regardless of if you hate both candidate or not, please.
If you are going argue against status quo material science for profit - you need to have valid studies done by respected institutions memorized for interviews! Have your rebuttal studies talking points down!
You can win this, RFK, Jr!
I wear one of my Kennedy 2024 t-shirts whenever going to a large public place. I only get smiles, fist pumps and friendly comments. I never get hostile comments anywhere. This is because your favorability ratio is vastly higher than the other two.
And now you are getting an awesome increase in support!
Same here. I have a pin on my purse that I actually forget is there, but people always remind me of it with their positive comments. And I purposely wear my shirt to large events and crowded areas and the response has always been positive, along with some curiosity from folks who don’t yet realize he’s running. It feels so good to be boots on the ground!
Same here, a pin on my purse always and wearing a hat and t-shirt to all large gatherings and events and stickers on my car bumpers. The response is always positive…”love your shirt”, “love him, wish he were running.” I love responding, “he is, independent, check out Kennedy24.com!”
It's easy to design your own t-shirt. We could sell meme shirts and donate money to his campaign with profits from handmade merch.
Don't worry. Robert Kennedy has no path to victory because he is not running a serious campaign, just a con game to cheat small donors out of their money and to get personal attention.
That's beyond ridiculous. RFK hardly needs small donations. He's a Kennedy. Money is not his issue.
His family worth is around $15 Million. Money is an issue.
Polls are nice but the ballot access is going to be your downfall.
You could have run libertarian.
BTW, why are you becoming a war monger with Venezuela, Iran, and China?
Watch Jimmy Dore talk about your war mongering..
https://youtu.be/q_tFUAUJuNo
Jimmy Dore is one of the best barometers for antiwar pols. Unfortunately I've yet to see a pol (RFK's former campaign manager maybe DK?) stay on the correct side of the Jimmy Dore test. EVEN if they manage to keep Trump off the ballot, RFK Jr. wins few Trump supporters with his swampy war rhetoric.
You think supporting Hamas and asking Israel not to defend itself is anti-war?
What do you know about Hamas and what they have been doing in Gaza since 2006?
We know that Hamas has been financed and promoted by Israel in order to disunite the Palestinians (publicly admitted by Netanyahu)
Netanyahu is the wild card. He brags about his complete mRNA data base & first dibs for two years on new products. He made his citizens the pilot & many there know. Late 2019 he restated he would need Hamas. Large protests daily just prior to Hamas attack re his move to take control of the judges. He’s in office yet facing serious crimes. It’s all horrific & wish Kennedy could have found more balance.
rfk jr shot himself in the foot by taking a side and by remaining absolutely silent about the Palestinian issue. not a smart move to take a side. that's why Kucinich and so many top staff left his campaign. meanwhile, people are being slaughtered the conflict is horrendous on both sides and if you look at his daily posts on twitter there is no mention of the pressing issue taking place currently but a repeat of stuff we have hear over and over again. i love the one about what childhood pets he had. very appropriate for a presidential candidate to post about during a time like this. No mention at all about the one issue that most of the world is focusing on--very sad.
ISRAEL HELPED FUND HAMAS?
Mujama al-Islamiya later became Hamas before Intifada-I was launched in December 1987. Israel considered Mujama al-Islamiya and its successor organisation Hamas a lesser evil as compared to PLO and thought that dividing Palestinians will serve the interest of Jewish state. If Israel termed PLO a terrorist organisation and a major threat to its interests, Hamas was also against PLO because of its secular and nationalist outlook. That is how both Hamas and Israel were viewed as natural allies against PLO. But, later on when Hamas in 1988 killed two Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) personnel in Gaza, Israel turned against Hamas but it was too late. Hamas, which earlier labelled itself as a welfare and charity organization in Gaza and got favors from Israel, changed is tactics and exploited PLO’s peace process with Israel to gain popular support of those Palestinians who were disillusioned with Yasser Arafat’s mending of fences with the Jewish state despite the killing of hundreds of Palestinians in Intifada-I. Regrets among those Israeli officials who helped the creation of Hamas are well documented.
Hamas is mostly funded by Qatar, one of the US most loyal ally in the Middle East. Israel needs an adversary like Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc, to have an excuse to escalate against all the Palestinians, and to “play” victim in the eyes of the world. Hamas itself is not a monolithic organization but rather comprised of many factions, so it’s not clear, can it be controlled from one center or not. Time will tell who will benefit from this conflict. Will Israel be able to cleanse the Gaza? Next year, the concessions for the natural gas exploitation is due to expire, and Gazprom has already made an offer to the Palestinians to take over from British. Also, it’s not a coincidence that Israel is leveling the northern part of Gaza. This is the pathway of the “Ben Gurion Canal”, which is a part of IMEC. Israel would not be able to escalate this way without an incident of such scope and scale to serve as a pretext. Anyway, the humanitarian tragedy of the innocent civilians is enormous.
LOL you don't know anything of the sort.
Iran was re-armed with nuclear and Hamas was re-activated during Trump administration. These are not arguments to justify terrorism.
Kennedy supports Palestine cause, not Hamas cause
"I support the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people. These need not be mutually exclusive. Already, there are many areas of cooperation between Israelis and Palestinians that go unnoticed. It’s time for the Palestinian leadership to recognize Israel as the nation state and homeland of the Jewish people and for the Israeli leadership to re-offer a two-state solution with safe and secure borders." - RFK Jr
Iran doesn’t have a nuclear weapon. Iran’s nuclear program is non-belligerent and the enrichment level is very far from being military grade.
On the other hand, Israel has nuclear warheads and from time to time Israeli politicians allude to this fact.
RFK’s position on the Middle East and Eurasia is the same as the Neocons. The same rhetorics: Axis of evil, Control over oil, Israel as an American airplane carrier, etc.
By the way, it’s not upon Israeli leadership to “offer a two-state solution”. There are already several UN resolutions on this matter, which has been ignored by Israel and the US for decades. It’s not the Palestinians who steal the Israeli land, occupy the Golan Heights and parts of Lebanon, and keep Israeli women and children in prisons.
Must Zionist always lie? You are deliberately reframing the issue from a naked act of aggression to "self-defense", and a stance of anti-genocide to supporting Hamas.
"Zionist" always lie? Like "blacks" steal? or "Irish" drink? Showing a little bias perhaps? Here's some info on "zionism" for the sake of actual facts & knowledge: https://www.prageru.com/video/zionism-why-all-the-controversy. There are other sources besides Prager U, but they are comprehensive and fact-based.
You have any non zionist sources on zionism?
In my experience, people simply reject the source of information when the information doesn't agree with their pre-existing ideas. So, likely anything that explains the history in an academic way, like in the video, will strike you as biased. So, essentially the answer...for you...is no.
Zionists aren’t a race. It’s more like saying “Scientologists always lie” or “communists always lie” or “Nazis always lie.” In fact the equation of Zionists to race is a lie. EG “anti-Zionism is anti-semitism” is a slanderous lie.
I think it’s false that “Zionists always lie”, but you just did in the comparison you made. Or maybe you are just ignorantly spreading a lie? Showing a little bias?
Not sure what your point is. MY point was making broad condemning statements about groups of people is....you fill in the epithet. Last time I looked "Irish" aren't a race. So your point is...fill in the eptithet. Being "anti-zionist" isn't "anti-semitic" unless it is. When I see people protesting "anti-whatever other country." I'll know it isn't "anti-semitic". FYI: https://www.prageru.com/video/the-middle-east-problem
I've been concerned about this issue and I've been going back-and-forth as I listen to different commentators. Someone made a point that hadn't really occurred to me previously. Although I think Israel's right to the land that they took from the Palestinians in 1948 is quite questionable, the fact remains that the modern Palestinians and their leadership are fundamentalist zealots who do not believe in any of the human rights we cherish in the west, especially women's rights. They would happily take the entire world back to the eighth century if they could. So, regardless of how wrong Israel is in so many ways, It's bizarre to see liberals supporting Hamas. They are not the way they are because of Israel. They are the way they are because scorpions are the way they are.
The Israeli's did not "take" the land from the Palestinians. That's simply false. Here's some history & facts & RFKJ is on the right side of this issues, just like he is on all the others. https://www.prageru.com/video/israels-legal-founding
Prageru? Sound credible. I look forward to the balanced take on the conflict.
I'm confused. You're replying to my message about his war mongering of Iran Venezuela and China and you're connecting it to Israel?
>>>They are the way they are because scorpions are the way they are. << <
Zionist in a nutshell
Or a Green
That seems more fitting
Jill Stein MD is running again.
Kennedy: This is the situation we have right now
Dumbledore: OMG, he is endorsing the current situation. Whaaaaaaat!!!!
Bobby,
I would like to see you in the Oval Office. In order to ensure this outcome, I recommend that you immediately and thoroughly explain your support of Bill Ackman's open letter to the President of Harvard. Although some parts of his long missive are sensical and in alignment with your platform, others are not, specifically his recommendations to:
1) Not wait for police review of a situation involving the assault of an HBS student before taking disciplinary action against the alleged assailants
2)Take disciplinary action against students for expressing their individual opinions in open protest or on Slack message boards
3) Make such disciplinary actions part of a student's permanent record with lifelong repercussions because "No law firm, corporation or graduate program will hire or admit an antisemitic or racist student"
Are you REALLY condoning such measures? Guilty until proven otherwise? Disciplining those who express unsavory opinions? Destroying a young person's career path as a means of setting an example so that others will never cross the line with regard to what can be expressed?
How can you be a true defender of the First Amendment if you balk at supporting those who espouse ideas you find repugnant? You are coming across as a censor.
You Tweeted: "It’s time to hold college administrations responsible for the epidemic of campus antisemitism by insisting on zero-tolerance policies."
Is that really the solution? Having zero-tolerance policies? This is completely antithetical to your entire campaign, the "show me where I have gotten it wrong", your lawsuit against the Biden Administration, your testimony in open session on censorship.
Do you seriously believe the way to eliminate an idea is to crush those who express it? Hasn't history proven the opposite? Isn't it better to offer the so-called "anti-Semites" a seat at the table so their views can be expressed and be dismantled publicly? Or is this only acceptable when it comes to vaccine-science? These are the kinds of discussions college administrations should be defending in the hope that their students leave with prepared minds and attitudes.
Please articulate your ideas on this soon. Your silence may ultimately undermine your "path to victory". Any reasonable opponent on a debate stage will have no problem showing how your experiment in telling the American people the truth is just more hypocrisy.
Wishing you health and wisdom,
Madhava Setty, MD
He made it CLEAR he was talking about those that are bullying others with speech to incite harm to them. I totally agree with him! Free speech should never include inciting violence towards others.
Wonderful question. I, too, would like to hear the answer to this!!
Love from Canada. ❤
https://edwardcurtin.com/an-epistle-to-robert-f-kennedy-jr/
I totally agree and I have stop supporting him. His actions are in direction contradiction to what he has been saying for months. He is not a peace candidate, he is a status quo neo con when it comes to Israel. I was shocked by both his actions and lack thereof. i don't see him changing his stance nor do i think he can regain those who have rescinded their support. he shot himself in the foot, you are 100% correct in that he has joined the lobby for Israel even while the people and children of Gaza are being slaughtered and denied the most basic human needs, such as food, water, electricity, medicine, anesthesia and shelter. How he can be so silent is shocking to me, how he is not calling for a cease fire and supporting the need for humanitarian assistance for the people of Gaza is frightening. He has not shown any concern for the horrific bombardment and loss of life in Gaza, he has been silent regarding these people. He is not the man he tried to make us think he was. He is not a peace candidate, he is not for ending forever wars and the industrial military complex. He has walked right into the good guys (Israel), bad guys (Palestinians) trope, something he has speaken out against and now he has embraced it . He is showing that even as an independent candidate he won't buck the system when it comes to this conflict, so he is no different than anyone democrat or republican in our government. If he can't do it on this very pressing humanitarian issue where human beings are being slaughtered in unthinkable numbers, then why would I think he won't do the same on other issues. If genocide doesn't move him as a human being to speak out for what is right, than what does that say about him and his courage?
You must have missed a part of his peace speech where he said "not to say we should ignore the real dangers of the world"
Hamas wants to "sacrifice women and children (of Palestine) to spur jihad around the world, eradicate all jews and christians, and Allah will be the only God everyone will worship."
I'll leave you to decide if Israel should risk October 7 "again and again a million times"
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1719665588228751481
At first I only listened to those that are pro Palestine UNTIL I SAW AND HEARD protestors celebrating what Hamas did to civilians. That was disgusting and I would say the same about anyone that celebrated the loss of civilian lives. That is when I decided to research both sides including reading the Hamas Charter which clearly shows they are the ones with the intentions of genocide and learning what you wrote about how Hamas sacrifices civilians while Israel warns them. It's good to read comments like yours that knows what Hamas is really all about. Israel has the right to defend themselves. It's sad any loss of civilian lives on either side but Israel doesn't target them like Hamas does.
DID YOU HEAR ISRAELI supporters cheer for genocide?
No, but if I heard they did I would say the same thing that's disgusting! Were they cheering for Hamas to be eliminated or civilians, too? It's disgusting for anyone to celebrate the loss of civilian lives but I know that is not Israel's position to target civilians! But it is what Hamas does.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/defense-minister-announces-complete-siege-of-gaza-no-power-food-or-fuel/
“We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly”
I agree. I am very disappointed
Obviously you and so many like you do not know it's Hamas that wants genocide of all Jews! Read the Hamas Charter.
Also, I agree with this quote from the son of a Hamas leader.....
"Hamas started this war. This is not their first war against Israel. We have previous wars where they initiated the war against Israel and the world and the global public bent so fast and they begged for a cease fire in the past 3 wars against Hamas and Israel had to submit to public opinion and we did not finish them in the precious 3 wars every time Hamas came back stronger and this time the voices rise again asking to stop and cease the fire. What will happen tomorrow if they cease fire now? The job is not finished. This problem has been going on for 35 years..." "Israel says evacuate civilians leaflets through media give them opportunity of 20 days to evacuate but they didn't. They still give shelter to Hamas. In this case Israel is not responsible tor any harm that happens to civilians..."
Mosab Hassan Yousef
Hamas is irrelevant. If there was no Hamas then there would be another fundamentalist group. All these extremist groups were created to counter Soviet influence in the Middle East, because back then PLO was leftist organization. Egypt, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria were close to USSR as well. Hence the CIA has facilitated the founding of various groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, Hamas, etc to destabilize the countries and movements. Divide and conquer, simple as that. Now it’s out of control, because it’s not possible to control the terrorists.
"They still give shelter to Hamas. In this case Israel is not responsible for any harm that happens to civilians."
Zionist don't believe Israel has any agency. They know the IDF is indescribably bombing civilians, but she is not at fault. Ever.
I believe what I SEE AND HEAR and what the Hamas Charter reads. While there are extremists in all countries including here Israel does not target civilians. They warned them and told them where to go to safety. If they don't it's not on Israel. Hamas kept some of them from leaving. That is on Hamas!
There would be no Hamas if there is no reason for its existence, such as the occupation of the Palestine, South Lebanon or Golan, or for example forceful spreading of the settlements, apartheid, deprivation of the basic human rights etc.
It is simple: every action causes a reaction
I have not had time to research this quote so I can neither verify OR deny but if it's true it sure debunks the Palestine claims to Israel's land.
"1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state 2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state. 4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Arab-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state. 5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state. 6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state. 7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state. 8. Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state. 9. Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state. 10. Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state. 12. Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state. 13. Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state. 14. Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state. 15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state. 16. Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state. 17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 18. Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 19. Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state. 20. Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE."
History does not give the rights to anyone to be a hegemon. All around the world there are examples of creation of countries and even nations out of nothing. Just because some powers had a “great idea”. Ukrainians, Bosnians, Macedonians, Kosovars etc did not exist before the 20th century. They were invented out of someone’s interest. How were the borders drawn? Great powers again. Without any concern to the local people. How did UK and France divided the Arabian Peninsula after the WW1? To be easier to manipulate them, etc. But now, it is what it is. The peace is the most important thing. There can be no peace if it’s unjust and dictated by one force.
The Hamas Charter makes it clear they do not want peace!
Saudi Arabia’s former ambassador to the US Prince Bandar bin Sultan has called out the Palestinian leadership for its rejection of the UAE-Israel peace deal.
The word Palestine is a placeholder, there were Arabs in "Palestine" for thousands of years.
"10,000 years ago, a squirrel could travel to California to Texas without touching the ground because there were so many trees."
I am not saying the state of California or Texas existed 10,000 years ago, the word California and Texas means the geographic land mass that is known as California and Texas today.
Rfk didn't do that, the current admin did.
Also, we had economic issues for a decade at least. Remember 2008?
As much as I dislike Biden, this was caused by Clinton, Bush, Obama, etc. They're all crooked and sell the people out.
I never Said RFK did anything.????????
She was talking about rfk Jr not being true to his ideals
You said he ruined your country by blowing up pipelines etc...
So you were talking about Biden in response to nothing she said about Biden?
Confusing
You r right. I am confused...i missed all of the rant. I will remove the post. I just shocked myself by realizing that there may not be any difference between the two. Ugg. We really are screwed.
Yeah he's rattling against Venezuela, Iran, and China... WTF
Jimmy Dore on rfk's war mongering
https://youtu.be/q_tFUAUJuNo
I don't care how much ill-informed people ask him to do the wrong thing. Many of you probably thought he was crazy about covid but he had the right information and full information, you didn't. You were reacting out of emotion based on the propaganda you were being fed. He is not going to.
Also, you are clearly mischaracterizing his position, ignoring all the things he has said warning against escalation, condemning Netanyahu for injuring Israel's moral case and condemning Israel's actions on the West Bank.
Like JFK and RFK Sr, who both fought in WW2 and were around when Palestine Grand Mufti helped Hitler design the final solution in 1941, RFK Jr will always support the right of Israel to exist.
There was a ceasefire until Hamas broke it, killed civilians, including killing a father, raping the mother while burning her baby in an oven (this is not a fake story, myself and others have seen proof on Telegram and Israel has produced autopsy report).
Israel has been broadcasting messages before targeting Hamas operations. Hamas traps civilians in those buildings not allowing civilians to leave while they take cover in the tunnels. They haven't built any bomb shelters for civilians.
The leader of Hamas, who is worth $5 billion and living in Qatar, has said that they want to "sacrifice women and children to spur jihad around the world, eradicate all jews and christians, and Allah will be the only God everyone will worship."
Until Hamas no longer exists, there cannot be peace. How do you live with a neighbor who thinks you should not even exist? Israel gave complete autonomy to Palestine in 2005. Hamas immediately moved in, burned every aid and infrastructure Israel had given, destroyed all the greenhouses, declared war on Israel and used all the money they were getting in international aid to build rockets and tunnels instead of improving the lives of Gazans.
Before you say Israel is occupying, Israel was on that land 1700 years before Muhammad invented Islam, and they've been repeatedly displaced from their land starting with the Roman empire. Palestine on the other hand was never a country at any point in history. 93% of Palestine arabs in Jerusalem prefer Israeli rule over PA. That's according to Palestine state media poll!
Anyone who brands themselves a peace activist, propose a solution for Hamas. Until you are able to, your opinion is best kept to yourself. No one wants any more virtue signaling or soundbites. FWIW, I believe Bobby has been talking to a lot of people to get different perspectives about the situation.
"And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular – but one must take it simply because it is right." MLK
Robert Kennedy is a con artist. And his campaign team is a cable of unqualified grifters.
1) Palestinian rights within 1947 UN borders, not genocide.
2) Freedom of Speech.
I think the media is unknowingly contributing to this effort by calling you an anti-vaxxer. Its the younger voters, who have been force-vaxxed by the "Biden" administration, who are sick to death of seeing themselves and their friends jabbed literally to death, just to attend university and live normal working lives.
Not that you're a one-issue candidate, but both "Biden" and Trump are pro-vax, and I predict this "vax safety" position of yours will become more and more of a hidden advantage as time passes - kind of like the Vietnam War became a severe disadvantage with younger voters in 1968.
Meanwhile, the media has absolutely no clue - because they just aren't very bright. I hope they keep up with the 'anti-vax' thing. Think of it as a campaign contribution each time they do it. The more the media attacks you on this issue, the more the younger voters will trust you. Who wants to be jabbed to death? Not them.
We are praying for your safety and your success.
I've never been excited about any candidate in my life. This is the first time I feel any excitement about an election. Fck the media. Fck the uniparty propaganda. Let's go over the frickin' wall!
You got a tingle in your leg ?
Robert Kennedy, Jr. is the only one I will vote for!
Happy to see this and encourage you stay on the amazing path you are taking now. One thing I would suggest is to respond immediately with facts and data to any spurious claims made about your policies and beliefs so that your supporters can squelch those intentional false rumors immediately.
3 policies?
3 beliefs?
Can you answer without searching ?
Rebuild
Repair
Reunite
Those are the three policies and three beliefs
That could be applied to any candidate, probably in any country.
The 3 Rs
Kinda funny.
Love from New Zealand 🇳🇿
your path to victory DOES NOT INCLUDE cheering on GENOCIDE. Thanks to your regurgitation of Israeli PROPAGANDA about the 'mid east' 'conflict' we have no REAL peace/antiwar candidate. How do you go from warning about ww3 and wasted lives in ukraine to supporting the country that operates the worlds largest CONCENTRAITION CAMP in their effort to ELIMINATE their enemies ?
get a clue please https://on.soundcloud.com/FQZbE
The Hamas Charter makes it crystal clear they are the ones supporting genocide!
"Hamas started this war. This is not their first war against Israel. We have previous wars where they initiated the war against Israel and the world and the global public bent so fast and they begged for a cease fire in the past 3 wars against Hamas and Israel had to submit to public opinion and we did not finish them in the precious 3 wars every time Hamas came back stronger and this time the voices rise again asking to stop and cease the fire. What will happen tomorrow if they cease fire now? The job is not finished. This problem has been going on for 35 years..." "Israel says evacuate civilians leaflets through media give them opportunity of 20 days to evacuate but they didn't. They still give shelter to Hamas. In this case Israel is not responsible tor any harm that happens to civilians..."
Mosab Hassan Yousef who is the son of a Hamas founding leader.
>>>In this case Israel is not responsible to any harm that happens to civilians..."<< <
In this case Israel is not responsible to any harm that happens to civilians..."
lol.
https://www.dci-palestine.org/israeli_forces_use_five_palestinian_children_as_human_shields
"according to documentation collected by Defense for Children International" I would want to know where they got that documentation from? As I wrote there are extremists everywhere even here and if that's true those Israel forces involved should be condemned, tried and convicted.
Lets not forget the reporting that has been debunked such as it got reported Israel bombed a hospital but then we learn it was one of Hamas weapons that fell short of its target and got the hospital so I definitely don't trust anything that comes from Hamas! The Hamas Charter is very clear what their intentions are.
"...in the Hamas Constitution they say that Jihad is the path and dying for God is their greatest wish"
"the Israeli Declaration of Independence it says we extend our hand to all neighboring states and their peoples in neighboring states and their peoples in neighborliness can you hear the difference between the Muslims and the Jews between we want to die in Jihad and we offer our hand in peace this is important because the Palestinians live by their values..." Oren Cahanovitc
you really ned to do some research. first of all gaza is the largest open air prison on the planet and what we just witnessed was a prison break. israelis were and are starving them by calculating how many calories just above starvation to allow in. They also created and have funded hamas. Lots of israelis say that the idf stood down for 6 hours and let it happen. One big reason is the oil and gas reserves off gaza coast that they would have to share the profits of. of course these israelis are like any capitalist ass and CANNOT SHARE....https://substack.com/home/post/p-138832644?source=queue
Oh, I have done my research now and on both sides! I didn't to start with. I kept listening to everyone that's pro Hamas until I saw and heard things that made me decide I would research both sides.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qmeQkDJ7qQ
Title: "
WATCH what the media won’t show you:"
Israel does everything it can to protect life. Hamas does everything it can to end it.
Of course, there are extremists in all countries even here.
Do you know what free Palestine REALLY means??
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHlmRutknMQ
Title:
Young Palestinian Girl EXPOSES the Truth About the FREE PALESTINE Movement
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzbHU2kO2_w
Title:
"The TRUTH about Palestinian civilians"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4UPLdDlrZM
Title:
Hamas founder’s son says ‘barbaric’ group must be removed from power | Cuomo
Mosab Hassan Yousef who is the son of a Hamas founding leader
"Hamas started this war. This is not their first war against Israel. We have previous wars where they initiated the war against Israel and the world and the global public bent so fast and they begged for a cease fire in the past 3 wars against Hamas and Israel had to submit to public opinion and we did not finish them in the precious 3 wars every time Hamas came back stronger and this time the voices rise again asking to stop and cease the fire. What will happen tomorrow if they cease fire now? The job is not finished. This problem has been going on for 35 years..." "Israel says evacuate civilians leaflets through media give them opportunity of 20 days to evacuate but they didn't. They still give shelter to Hamas. In this case Israel is not responsible tor any harm that happens to civilians..."
Mosab Hassan Yousef who is the son of a Hamas founding leader.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGmg198RpEk
Title: The Brutal Details About Palestinians the Media Ignores
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNmwwrjwmPE
Title:
Son Of HAMAS On The Ignorance Of #FreePalestine
Mosab Hassan Yousef, who is the son of a Hamas founding leader
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKQ0UxEgXTQ
Title:
A New Message for Hamas from Son of Hamas Leader
I wish all Palestinians open their minds and know that Hamas is their real enemy.
https://www.arabnews.com/node/1750821/prince-bandar-bin-sultan-interview-reveals-truth-about-palestinian-issue
https://english.alarabiya.net/features/2020/10/05/Saudi-Arabia-s-Prince-Bandar-bin-Sultan-calls-out-Palestinian-leaders-over-peace-deal
Saudi Arabia’s former ambassador to the US Prince Bandar bin Sultan has called out the Palestinian leadership for its rejection of the UAE-Israel peace deal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niBheF7PF5g
Title:
Reacting to some (Smart) Anti-Israel Comments
He answers some questions about Israel's alleged atrocities
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OF95GenB1JI
Title:
Why are there so many Palestinian casualties? (The Israeli perspective)
Channel: travelingisrael.com Oren Cahanovitc
"...in the Hamas Constitution they say that Jihad is the path and dying for God is their greatest wish"
"the Israeli Declaration of Independence it says we extend our hand to all neighboring states and their peoples in neighboring states and their peoples in neighborliness can you hear the difference between the Muslims and the Jews between we want to die in Jihad and we offer our hand in peace this is important because the Palestinians live by their values..." Oren Cahanovitc
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2302309/how-and-why-israel-helped-create-hamas
ISRAEL HELPED FUND HAMAS?
Mujama al-Islamiya later became Hamas before Intifada-I was launched in December 1987. Israel considered Mujama al-Islamiya and its successor organisation Hamas a lesser evil as compared to PLO and thought that dividing Palestinians will serve the interest of Jewish state. If Israel termed PLO a terrorist organisation and a major threat to its interests, Hamas was also against PLO because of its secular and nationalist outlook. That is how both Hamas and Israel were viewed as natural allies against PLO. But, later on when Hamas in 1988 killed two Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) personnel in Gaza, Israel turned against Hamas but it was too late. Hamas, which earlier labelled itself as a welfare and charity organization in Gaza and got favors from Israel, changed is tactics and exploited PLO’s peace process with Israel to gain popular support of those Palestinians who were disillusioned with Yasser Arafat’s mending of fences with the Jewish state despite the killing of hundreds of Palestinians in Intifada-I. Regrets among those Israeli officials who helped the creation of Hamas are well documented.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk3yMJ7i7pE
‘They plan to kill all Jews’: Hamas objective revealed after ‘undercover’ interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNf40sBcvKk
Title:
Free Palestine? No thanks! (The Israeli perspective you’ve probably never heard.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEoVzKyD_IM
Title "Here’s THE TRUTH About the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (A Comprehensive History)
Why don't you consider Trump anti war ?
Look at his actions as president.
listen to his last speech on gaza
Let's do this.
How would you rank him on the anti war scale compared to past and present presidents ?
Trump vetoed stopping our involvement in the Yemen War. Other things he did that shows he's not anti war.
There are more reasons why I won't vote for him!
Weak
You might think it's weak but many didn't when he vetoed that bill!
I think your definition of not anti war is weak
My definition of any bill that can stop OUR involvement in any war that is vetoed is certainly not someone that is anti war. Having the position of our troops being in some wars but not others it not an anti war position but feel free to put whatever definition on that you want.
Do you think there may be players that want the issue you seem so passionate about to cloud our elections ?
99 layers of hasbara to fuel the israeli killing machine Abby and Robby Martin
I’ve had quite a few trips around the sun and have to say I’ve never been this excited about a political campaign. (Your father would’ve been my guy had I been alive and old enough to vote for him!) Thank you for giving me a reason to care, a reason to have hope. Thank you for focusing on what’s going on in the US, first and foremost.
Trolls are gonna troll, it’s fun to block them on your posts. No candidate who wants to win will come out against Israel. I believe In your heart you know what needs to be done and believe you’ll handle things appropriately when in office.
You’ve got this, Bobby (Mr. President). Momentum is on your side, clearly. Remember to “never stop never stopping.” 🗡️❤️
Look, let me say this - you are my second choice for president right now. DJT is first. Biden is 3rd, but above West and Stein.
However, I will go back to a point I made to my friends in 1992 -lets say you do win in a 3 way race. You will have no congressional support. 435 Democratic/Republican congresspersons, and 100 DNC/GOP senators will all oppose you (ok maybe you get the 2 "independent" candidates but thy are democrats we all know it it).
So I do truly ask you, Mr. Kennedy - how will you get anything done? Congress will have zero interest in assisting you on passing any legislation. And please don't pretend they will do it "in the national interest" when we watched Ms. Pelosi refuse to give Trump his infrastructure bill because she knew it would help him, instead hoping a democrat would be elected and giving that success to them (which is what happened), or Senator McConnell deny Obama a supreme court justice hoping a republican would win (which happened)(. They will just wait you out.
Imagine a supreme court justice appointment. Which party is going to rally to your side? Unless that justice come out and swears on a stack of aborted babies they will support abortion again, the Democrats will not back them (because they have no proof that the justice will back their causes) nor will the Republicans either. And let's be honest - we know that is how they think. They all know how the newest justice will vote 90-95% of the times (there are a few curve balls, but democrats know that democratic appointed justices will support democratic sides in supreme court cases - as will the GOP).
What do you honestly expect to get passed? Spending cuts? Nope. Tax increases? Nope. Social spending? Nope. I don't even truly know if you will get a cabinet confirmed. Imagine the 10,000 other executive appointments needing congressional approval. Think they will be falling over themselves to back your appointment? Don't make me laugh.
It is in no one's political interest to help you. It may be in the country's, but no one in Washington cares what the country wants/needs/thinks.
So voting for you is really voting for no action by the government for 4 years. I am not opposed to that, but your only course of doing anything will be executive order, which will be overcome the day you leave.
So someone tell me why this is a good idea, regardless of if you hate both candidate or not, please.
If you are going argue against status quo material science for profit - you need to have valid studies done by respected institutions memorized for interviews! Have your rebuttal studies talking points down!